At 03:14 PM 12/11/98 -0500, Pres Waterman wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree WIN-CE is inferior to 95/LINUX, etc....
>> But I too have pondered the possibility of installing WIN-CE on my PC110.
>> Particularly beacuse it's simply a basic/lightweight OS which should zoom
>> on a 20MB 486... sorta like a WIN95 "Lite" maybe??
>> It would do the basics and prolly leave a lot of room for other stuff...
>
>Funny, I asked the same thing of a friend. He is of the opinion that WinCE
>is not a "D"OS- but rather ROM-based, and not siutable for x86 processors.
>
>Pres Waterman N2PW
>c/o Patchogue Motors, Inc.
>Ford and Kia dealer
>
>"Who needs a big JOHNSON
>when ya got a little FLUTIE?"
>GO BILLS!
>